57.1 Overall Score (down 17 since Aug 1st.)

Denmark

  • 25.1 Public Health
    Directives
  • 63 Financial
    Response
  • 100 Fact-Based
    Communication
  • 25.1 Public Health
    Directives
  • 63 Financial
    Response
  • 100 Fact-Based
    Communication

Denmark scores slightly above the median, due to a robust healthcare system and to fiscal responses that safeguarded employment. Limited public health directives bring its score down.

Pre-COVID Conditions

Denmark’s universal healthcare system, coupled with a high GDP per capita and low debt-to-GDP ratio have contributed to its effective pandemic-response policies, though it is hurt by its low number of hospital beds.

  • Debt/GDP ratio 34.3%
  • GDP/capita $55,675
  • Gini coefficient (out of 100) 28.7
  • Infant mortality rate (out of 1,000 live births) 4
  • Healthcare access score (out of 100) 85.7
  • Hospital beds/1,000 People 17.5

Government Response

Select a data point for more information
(Data points represent policy level as of Jan 1.)
25.1

Public Health Directives

Despite Denmark’s very high testing levels, relatively low emergency healthcare spending and a relaxed lockdown pull down its score.

  • Stay at home order 1
  • Public gathering restrictions 4
  • School closings 2
  • Public event cancellations 2
  • Testing policy 3
  • Emergency healthcare investments/capita $16.53
  • Travel restrictions 3
  • Tests/1,000 people 1815.3
  • Contact tracing 2
63

Financial Response

Denmark’s financial response has been relatively strong, driven by its generous income support.

  • Financial stimulus as share of GDP 16%
  • Income support 2
  • Debt forebearance 2
100

Fact-Based Communication

Denmark’s prime minister conducts weekly briefings that emphasise clear, fact-based messages.

  • Reliance on science/fact based information 0
  • Press freedom 0

COVID-19 Status as of Jan 1

Denmark scores near the median in this category, with a fairly low death rate and a very low positivity rate, although its case rate is relatively worse than before.

  • Total deaths 1,322
  • Death rate per 100K 228.2
  • Total cases 166,567
  • Cases per 100K 28,757
  • Percent of positive tests 3.2
  • Change in positivity rates +2
Case Trend Line
Daily cases Level 1 Lockdown
Date Status New Cases/1M
1 Apr 15 Primary schools reopen 31.55
2 Apr 20 Non-essential health care services and some businesses, such as hair salons, reopen 29.55
3 May 11 Retail stores reopen 20.79
4 May 18 Restaurants and secondary schools reopen 11.22
5 May 21 Museums and zoos reopen 11.57
6 May 27 Cultural activities reopen 9.00
7 Jun 08 Numbers allowed at public gatherings raised from 10 to 50 6.49
8 Jul 01 Numbers allowed at public gatherings raised from 50 to 100 4.42
9 Aug 22 Facemasks mandatory on public transportation 18.99
10 Sep 19 Public gatherings limited to 50 people, and bars and restaurants must close at 10pm, until October 4th 71.33
11 Dec 07 Implemented targeted lockdowns in 38 of 98 municipalities 300.28
12 Dec 15 Lockdown extended to all municipalities 525.44

Differentiating Factors

Compared with Neighboring Countries
  • 53.9
    Norway 49,803
    Cases
    9,187
    Per 1M
    436
    Deaths

    Norway scores just above the median, pulled down by its weak public health score, countering its semi-strong financial response and reliance on facts and a free press.

  • 30.8
    Sweden 437,379
    Cases
    43,308
    Per 1M
    8,727
    Deaths

    Despite being known for a relatively strong public healthcare system, Sweden has been hit hard with cases; the country’s lack of stay-at-home orders and school closures, limited testing, and few gathering restrictions overshadowed its financial support and a reliance on facts and accountability with an open press.

  • 52.6
    Germany 1,762,637
    Cases
    21,038
    Per 1M
    34,145
    Deaths

    Germany’s pandemic response has been praised around the world for its rapidly implemented contact tracing strategy and science-based leadership, although its public health policy declined significantly since the fall, bringing its overall score near the median; however, the data does not adequately account for Germany's contact tracing.

Further Reading From Foreign Policy

Be the source of actionable insight.

Select one of the subscription options below to read the full Covid-19 Global Response Index. Unlock even more global intelligence with a subscription to FP Insider.

Already an FP Insider?

Best Value

One-Year All Access
FP Insider

$450

1-year of full access to FP Insider exclusive content and subscription benefits

See benefits  ▾

  • All FP Analytics Special Reports, including the COVID-19 Global Response Index
  • FP Analytics Power Maps
  • Editorial conference calls
  • Unlimited articles on ForeignPolicy.com
  • Digital and print editions of FP’s award-winning magazine
  • Print archive, containing 50 years of FP journalism
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Security and defense news alerts
  • Bonus episodes of FP podcasts
  • FP mobile app

❌ Hide benefits

 

One-Month
Limited Access

$99

30-day access to the Index only

Looking for group access? Contact us directly

New Zealand

Statistics and government response factors available on each country profile include:

Pre-COVID Conditions:

  • Debt to GDP ratio
  • Infant mortality rates
  • Hospital beds per 1,000 people
  • Gini coefficients measuring inequality
  • Health access and quality

COVID-19 Public Health Directives:

  • Stay-at home orders
  • School-closing policy
  • Public-gathering restrictions
  • Cancellation of public events
  • Testing policy and rates per 1,000 people
  • Emergency healthcare spending per capita
  • Travel restrictions
  • Contact tracing

COVID-19 Financial Response:

  • Stimulus package as a share of GDP
  • Income support
  • Debt-forbearance

Public Communications:

  • Instances of misinformation by leadership
  • Limitations on press freedom, censorship

Current/Historic In-Country COVID-19 Status:

  • Death rates per 1 million
  • Case rates per 1 million